Introduction
In an era defined by nuclear proliferation, climate change driven by industrial processes, and the unchecked rise of artificial intelligence, it is tempting to view science as a destructive force. While science has undeniably improved human welfare, the scale and irreversibility of its potential harms suggest that it may indeed constitute the greatest threat facing the world today.
Science has produced weapons of mass destruction capable of ending civilisation.
Explain
The development of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons represents a direct existential threat to humanity. Unlike conventional warfare, these weapons can annihilate entire populations and render regions uninhabitable for generations, meaning the consequences of scientific progress in this domain are uniquely catastrophic.
Example
The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 killed over 200,000 people and demonstrated the terrifying power of nuclear science. Today, nine nations possess approximately 12,500 nuclear warheads, and organisations like the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists have moved the Doomsday Clock to 90 seconds to midnight, the closest it has ever been.
Link
This demonstrates that science has furnished humanity with the means of its own extinction, lending weight to the claim that it is the greatest threat to the world.
Scientific and industrial advancement has driven ecological destruction and climate change.
Explain
The scientific knowledge that powered the Industrial Revolution also unleashed carbon emissions on an unprecedented scale. Modern agriculture, fossil fuel extraction, and chemical manufacturing, all products of scientific progress, have degraded ecosystems and destabilised the global climate in ways that threaten food security and biodiversity.
Example
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warned in 2018 that global temperatures could rise by 1.5 degrees Celsius as early as 2030, triggering catastrophic sea-level rise and extreme weather events. Singapore, a low-lying island nation, faces existential threats from rising seas and has committed $100 billion over the coming century to coastal protection.
Link
The fact that science-driven industrialisation has brought the planet to the brink of ecological collapse supports the argument that science is a profound threat to the world.
Advances in artificial intelligence and biotechnology pose risks that are difficult to control or reverse.
Explain
Emerging scientific fields such as AI and genetic engineering carry risks that even their creators do not fully understand. The potential for autonomous weapons, engineered pandemics, or runaway artificial intelligence represents a new category of threat where the speed and complexity of the technology outpaces our ability to regulate it.
Example
In 2023, leading AI researchers including Geoffrey Hinton signed an open letter warning that AI could pose an existential risk to humanity. Meanwhile, the COVID-19 pandemic revealed how vulnerable the world is to novel pathogens; gain-of-function research in laboratories has raised fears that an even deadlier virus could be accidentally or deliberately released.
Link
These emerging and poorly understood dangers illustrate that scientific progress can outrun humanity's capacity to manage its consequences, reinforcing the view that science is the greatest threat we face.
Counter-Argument
Science has saved far more lives than it has endangered through medical breakthroughs, agricultural innovation, and public health advances. The development of mRNA vaccines alone saved an estimated 20 million lives in 2021, and the Green Revolution prevented mass famine across Asia and Africa.
Rebuttal
While science has produced great benefits, these do not cancel out the existential risks it has also created. A single nuclear exchange or engineered pandemic could cause irreversible civilisational collapse, and unlike past threats, these dangers are unique products of scientific progress that would not exist without it.
Conclusion
Given the existential risks posed by nuclear weapons, bioengineered pathogens, and ecological destruction enabled by scientific advancement, it is reasonable to argue that science represents the greatest threat to the world today. The sheer scale of potential catastrophe, where a single misapplication could threaten all of civilisation, sets scientific threats apart from other dangers.
Introduction
Science has been humanity's most powerful engine of progress, responsible for eradicating diseases, feeding billions, and connecting the globe. To label it the greatest threat is to confuse the tool with its wielder; the dangers the world faces stem not from science itself but from the political, economic, and ethical failures that govern its application.
Science has saved far more lives than it has endangered, making it a net benefit rather than a threat.
Explain
Medical science has eradicated smallpox, dramatically reduced child mortality, and increased global life expectancy from around 30 years in 1900 to over 70 today. Agricultural science, through the Green Revolution, averted mass famine by enabling food production to keep pace with population growth. These achievements far outweigh the harms attributed to science.
Example
The development of mRNA vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic saved an estimated 20 million lives in 2021 alone, according to a study published in The Lancet. In Singapore, the nation's science-driven public health system contributed to one of the lowest COVID-19 fatality rates in the world at approximately 0.1 percent.
Link
The overwhelming positive impact of science on human survival and wellbeing suggests that it is far from the greatest threat; rather, it is our most important defence against the dangers we face.
The real threats stem from political and economic failures, not from science itself.
Explain
Nuclear weapons exist because of geopolitical rivalries, not because physicists wished for destruction. Climate change persists because governments and corporations prioritise profit over sustainability. Science provides the knowledge, but human institutions decide how it is used, meaning that the true threats lie in governance failures rather than in scientific discovery.
Example
The Paris Agreement of 2015 demonstrated that climate science had provided clear solutions, yet many nations, including major emitters like the United States under the Trump administration, chose to withdraw from the accord for political reasons. Similarly, the global failure to equitably distribute COVID-19 vaccines was a failure of political will, not of the science that produced them.
Link
This shows that science is not the source of the world's greatest threats; rather, it is the misuse and mismanagement of scientific knowledge by political actors that causes harm.
Science provides the essential tools needed to address the world's most pressing challenges.
Explain
Far from being a threat, science offers the only viable path to solving problems like climate change, disease, and food insecurity. Renewable energy technology, carbon capture, and sustainable agriculture are all scientific endeavours. Abandoning or fearing science would leave humanity without the means to confront the very crises that threaten it.
Example
Singapore's investment in desalination and NEWater technology is a prime example of science being used to overcome existential resource constraints. NEWater now meets up to 40 percent of the nation's water demand, turning a critical vulnerability into a strength through scientific innovation.
Link
Since science is indispensable to solving the world's greatest problems, it is more accurately described as humanity's greatest hope rather than its greatest threat.
Counter-Argument
Science has produced weapons of mass destruction and driven climate change on a scale that threatens human civilisation itself. The Doomsday Clock stands at 90 seconds to midnight, and AI researchers have warned that artificial intelligence could pose an existential risk to humanity.
Rebuttal
These dangers are products of political and institutional failures in how scientific knowledge is applied, not of science itself. Nuclear weapons exist because of geopolitical rivalries, and climate change persists because governments prioritise economic growth over sustainability, meaning the root cause is human decision-making, not scientific inquiry.
Conclusion
Ultimately, science is a morally neutral enterprise whose outcomes depend on human choices. The greatest threats to the world, be they war, inequality, or environmental collapse, are products of political and economic systems rather than of scientific inquiry itself. Blaming science obscures the real sources of danger and risks depriving humanity of the very tool it needs to solve its most pressing problems.